ET I E R O ft. CaPIVACCEI- 24

interlndicationcm & Analogifmum. Dogma- DijferetitUticus ex cognitione caufsc & relicjuorum, id eft in l erloci & facultatis j dcuenitin cognitioncm iu- cattonemuantis,hoc pertinet ad Dogmaticum, & in In- & Anaio-dicationc&in Analogifmo;& augctur dubt- pfiPf^f-tatio, cjuia Galenus ad Thrafybulum 2.dicit, AdThra.2,tranfitum cffeafimili ad fimiie in Empiricis,Vt refpiciunt fcnfata Rationalis a natura rei in-dicantis. SiRationalis in Analogifmo proce-dit a natura rci Indicantis, cgo nefcio quomo-do diftinsuitur Analogifmus ab Indicationc.

• • r

Galenus naturam rei in Analogifmo propo-nit,vt diftinguat Analogifmum Dogmaticoruab Analogifmo Empiricorum.

S O L V T 1 O.

Diccndum Dogmaticum diftinguere Indi-cationcmab Analogifmo. Na in Analogifmofit tranfitusa. fimili noto raticni,intellc£tui,non fcnfuijad diffcrentiam Empiricorum, feddum in Analogifmo fit tranfitusafimili intel-lechii noto,fit poftcatranfitus ad fimile, quodfimilenoncftnotum,fiueratiocinio fiue dif-curfu. Vndehocnoncftnotumita intcllcctuicjucmadmodum in Indicatione. Recte intclli-gatis,In Analogifmo hi$ jppbnitUr fitnile, quo-rum alterum eft ratione notum,illud priusjfedillud pofterius quod indicatur eft notum perfimilitudinem, per ratiocinium ad differenti-am Indicationis,

LE-