325

iner alle Dialecte fanden". Sc. cas etiam quas olimdialectos fuisse fingebant.

Atque has de medio spiritu disputationes sicuti a prin-cipibus grammaticis institutae fuerunt, valuisse deincepsin commentariis Homericis ex locis allatis affatim con-stitit. Reliquum est ut ceteras, quae ad haec carminapertinent, eius generis quaestiones, auctorum nomini-bus nunc magna ex parte carentes, sed ex Hero-diani prosodiis Homericis excerptas paene omnes, hucconferam.

Etym. M. p. 340, 25 daavverai 6s xb ivitnd^vccrcb tov EvisaO-at ioig litaTiotg. Pertinet ad £, 180.Locus Etymologici illinc petitum scholion est. —

Z, 348 h'vda (.te xv/t anoeQoe, nctQcg tcc6s EQya

yevsadai.

Schol. A anosQoe' vjtlcoTeov' tcc yceQ cptovrjevza xata-hfjyovta slg zb q ETticpeQO/.iivov zov a iptlovo&ai cptXei,aQoavTeg — ovzcog yctQ iliyo/tev nsQt tovtov xai ev ztjA (>aiptp6ia (136) — cet. Haec Herodiani sunt. — Cf.Etym. M. 377, 40.

£1, 540 cil)? eva naWa Tixev navacoQtov — Schol.A navacoQiov) oi /tiv idaovvav, iva hx6i^covTai tovxazcc navTa moqov. ot 6e ixpilcoaav kx8e%6iievoi tov elgnavTa necpQovxia/tivov. a/tetvov 6s %b ttqotsqov. tovtoy&Q ed-ilec orj/taivf.iv. Cf. Eust. 1364 navacoQtov 6s ?jzbv nccvrrj cccoqov kiysi, naQcc tt)v coQav tov xatQov, 6ibxal i6aovvETO naQtx tioi xazcc tt)v nQonaQahjyovoav. - r}naQcc to zr)vl toQav zr)v q)QovTi6a , zbv navv necpQovTia-/tevov. n avanaltv tog ev q&si tov nccvv 6i%a cpQOvTi-6og, odev ziveg xal hxpilovv amo. vor)oai y&Q cpuavTCogtov navxr/ ioqcuov, ? 6q vivsg einov, oxvrooi %ig av.