327

oOat, otdauev 8e xai to ii8e Qtjfia avveyiog naQvc t<p noi-Ttj (add. 8aavv6ftevov), elxoztog av q>r)oaiftev ozt to ex.E7il(>()i]iia nQog~]Xdev xcci omtog e<pvfox%tlt] zov Q)']fiazogi} daaeia tog ev le§et avvOezto' zb ftevcoi tade dudoeaig;lazt zov rjde. Herodiani.A, 358 y.azaeiacczo ;

ocpQa 8e Tv8ei8i]g fiezcc dovQazog toyez eQcorjv^zTjXe Stcc nQOftaytov, o&i ol y.azoeiaazo yaii]g,zocpQ. —

Schol. A xazaeiaazo iptXiozeov' anb yctQ zov el'8tope.Qvzovov 6 oyj]fiuTiofi6g. Sch. BL ecpdvi] tcuqo. zqel'8to' y xazi]yj})], naQa zb eYto zb 8i]Xovv zb noQeuofiat*Mirum esset, si Herodianus tam perverse hunc locumintellexisset ut verbum xazaeiaazo ab tidto derivaretatque per ecpavrj explicaret „ubi ei humi apparebat ha-sta". Hoc illis posferioribus relinquendum, quorumcommenta in Sclioliis B et L legimus, unde illud et8toin scholion codieis A puto invito auctore migrasse,Equidem ab Herodiano putaverim eX& profectum esse,Inquisiverunt enim veteres in rationes , etir lenis essetverbi elftt appellatio: Eust. p. 1407 ipitovvai 8e zb eJi.ity.ai zb eig avzi zov noQeij], zQy.fl dtot zrv InivOeoiv tovf allcog yccQ daavvea&at tocpetf.ev tcnb tov "to to no-Qevofiat.. Forma etto ubique a grammaticis adhibita informis vocabuli eif.it explicandis, E. M. 121,29. SchoJ.Hes. Scut. 23. — Fortasse fuerunt, qui eo de quo di-cimus loco y.aTcteiaaTO a xa$ — i'co (xctOi>]fii) dcriva-rent, sensu intransitivo (cf. Buttm. gr. I p. 545), iique.ab Herodiano refutati. Sed haec mera suspicio est.

E, 164 a exovTag, oveqrjoig eoztzov exovzazb aexov-za. 8tb Saavvzeov zb e. nzaiei ovv Niy.iag iptfcav zb e^oiezat yi).Q t<7>. axovza enevzidead-at zb e, oneQ ovx 1'ozt.zb y&Q axovca ovvccloicpr) eazt zov ccexovzog' 8ta zi 8e■cb a hptltodTj, tv eteQOig tcpaftev. Scilicet quod priva-tivum esset, ^,301: quod sempeiblcnem spiritum habet.