342
oculi gaudent dolcant aures. — Ita asphasse Athenien-ses propter certisslwa illustrium grammaticorum testi-
oXoxXrjnov) tovtov yccQtv Sict tov i yodcpeTai. In contrariam par-tem hic annectamus de causa augmenti observationem gramma-tici aliquanto haud dubie recentioris: Et. M. p. 8-20, '25 a^tov SkCi]irjOut, SiiciC niivioie ueye&vveitti 6 nccnctTccTiy.os; xul iaxiv tineTv,oti inttSi) 6 nuQuiuny.bs nXecov iori xcticc t!jv or\fxua(uv tov ive-aimios (o yuQ iveonbs uxccqiuTos Ioti, xul a/xu tco XiyeaOcct fyet xai- to tivcci. 6 Se nuQuTUTixbs nctnctieinfiivijv iyet ir)v ar\fcaa(av) tovtovyctniv cbs nXeovexitov xaiu tj)v Or]fitta(uv ibv iveaicoTct, nXeovexieT. xa\xaiu ti)v uQyJiv, — Varro 1. 1. V, 24 p. 122. Sp. „Vallum vel quodea varicare nemo posset, vel quod singula ibi extrema vacilla fur-cillata habent figuram litterae V". Apul. de diphtong §. 25. Saecu-lum per e breve deberet notari, quoniam a sequor, vel ut placetVarroni (V. 2. p. 193 Sp.) a sene derivatum est. Sed quia remproductissimam designabat, placuit ut eius principalis syllaba sig-niiicationis causa produceretur et per dipthongum plane dignos-ceretur, Sen. quaest. Nat. II, 56 Dicimus enim ut splendere sic•fulgere, At illis (antiquis) ad significandum hanc e nunibus subi-tae lucis eruptionem mos erat media syllaba correpta ut dicerentfulgere. Ioann. Diac. Allegor. Thecog. Hes. 549. Gsf. noXXccscf tvQ^aet tis avftnccayovaug Xiitts tois in ccvicov aijftatvoftivois xal
ftiuov/uivus ttiiu. xal iictQivs tov Xoyov ib Xiuos ovofta.......xal
to iSiu ovoiict y.ccl to eiSos ftttoivQovai. Tb yp.Q iSia Stu tov i yQct-tptiat, ir)v jcov iSecov lxe(vcov vnoarjuaTvov dnX6ii]ici tcov HXutiovi-
xtov....... Tangit eandem rem p. 567, de yifccana et ye(ftctQQOS
exponens. Praeterea (549): \4XJl ZneQ iXiyofiev. iijs ln antiQatcov cxqiOlicov nnooSov t) tov nvevftaios ion SaavTrjS Srjl.coiixrj. Do-cet cur omnes numeri, quorum principalis litera est e, aspirenturexcepto ivviu. OQ/ur)v yuQ coaavel if,voixr)v eyet to ev eis ay.e6aaf.iovTe xcci nXi]'Jv0ft6v, ijV Sij QOntjV vnoar]fia(vecv ifriXei tov nvevftaiost) Sctaviijs. cf. de || p. 551. De ivvia p. 548. et 551 infr. „ivviaSe etQrjiat itnb tov to IxyvOev tv xtxl Sid tcov ciXXcov nQoeX&bv ftiX-Xeiv iv t\> StxitSt, SevTtntvoftivy ovoij ttovdSi, nuXtv evovoOut y.ainQos eavTo aiQicpeaOut xccl avuxdunieiv. "Q3-ev xal iptXoviat, t>)vavaioXrjv ti)v nnbs iccvib tov nvevuciios tov \pc%»v iftcpu(vovTOs. (tScilicet aiU hic Pythagoreus est aut nemo : r( to aocpdnccTov; uqi-Sfio.;. SevieQOV Si; to toTs nQctyftctoi id ovoftaia ztO-iuevov (Iambl.vit. Pyth. 82). — Denique addimus hoc ex recenti scholio (iB. L.)